a站被罚12万元

明确自动驾驶违法由车企担责，道路交通安全法修订草案提请审议_我的网站

A |     New Delhi, Oct 21 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a petition filed by Dr Rajneesh Singh, who claimed to be the media in-charge of BJP's Ayodhya unit, seeking opening of certain rooms of the Taj Mahal to put to rest the "alleged history" of the historic monument including claims that it was a Shiva temple, Tejo Mahalaya.

The petition filed by Dr Singh, who claimed to be the media in-charge of the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) Ayodhya unit, sought a direction to the government to constitute a fact-finding committee and to “look for important historical evidence” like idols and inscriptions that are believed to be hidden inside the Taj Mahal on the orders of the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan.

Dr Singh has earlier filed the plea before the Allahabad High Court, but it dismissed it, forcing him to approach the Supreme Court for relief.

A bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice MR Shah and also comprising Justice MM Sundresh said that the plea, an appeal against an order of the Allahabad High Court, was a 'publicity interest litigation' and dismissed the petition.

"The High Court was not in error in dismissing the petition, which is more of a publicity interest litigation. Dismissed," the apex court ordered.

The petitioner had argued before the Allahabad High Court that many Hindu groups have been claiming that the Taj Mahal is an old Shiva Temple which was known as Tejo Mahalaya, a theory that was supported by many historians as well.

Dr Singh stated that there are 22 rooms situated in the upper and lower portion of the four-storied building of the Taj Mahal that are permanently locked and historians like PN Oak and many Hindu worshippers believe that a Shiva temple lies in those rooms.

UNI SM SHK2053。

B |      8 月 25 日消息，据新华社报道，今日（8 月 25 日），道路交通安全法修订草案提请十四届全国人大常委会第二十四次会议初次审议。据了解，现行道路交通安全法于 2004 年施行，2007 年、2011 年、2021 年修正了个别条款。此次修订草案共 9 章 170 条，明确了自动驾驶汽车的上道路行驶条件、违章处理原则和保险制度等；聚焦“醉驾”“盲驾”“僵尸车”“超标车”治理和电动自行车、“暴走团”管理等突出问题，有针对性完善制度措施；在维护道路交通安全的同时，推行便民举措，便利群众出行等。据报道，此次修订草案设置了“自动驾驶汽车的特别规定”专章，明确了自动驾驶汽车和辅助驾驶功能的概念，并明确自动驾驶汽车在自动驾驶功能激活状态下发生道路交通安全违法行为的，由自动驾驶汽车生产企业、进口企业接受处理。未激活自动驾驶功能的自动驾驶汽车和驾驶仅具备辅助驾驶功能的汽车上道路行驶，按照非自动驾驶汽车的规定管理。

Current article:http://epmp2.yinkataizengquge.bond/dhjue17/20260826/837198.xlsx

Published on:08:06:41